For Physicians. By Physicians.™

ObGFirst: Get guideline notifications, fast. First month free!Click here

Remdesivir Emergency Authorization: FDA Update and Summary of Preliminary NIH Study Data

NOTE: Information and guidelines may change rapidly. Check in with listed references in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ to best keep up to date

SUMMARY:

The FDA has issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the investigational antiviral drug remdesivir for the treatment of suspected or laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in adults and children hospitalized with severe disease. The approval is based on the NIH’s clinical trial showing “promising results.”

  • An EUA is different than a full FDA approval
    • An EUA is based on an FDA evaluation of evidence and risks vs potential or known benefits of of “unproven” products during an emergency
  • The FDA states

The emergency use authorization allows for remdesivir to be distributed in the U.S. and administered intravenously by health care providers, as appropriate, to treat suspected or laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in adults and children hospitalized with severe disease

Severe disease is defined as patients with low blood oxygen levels or needing oxygen therapy or more intensive breathing support such as a mechanical ventilator

It was determined that it is reasonable to believe that remdesivir may be effective in treating COVID-19, and that, given there are no adequate, approved, or available alternative treatments, the known and potential benefits to treat this serious or life-threatening virus currently outweigh the known and potential risks of the drug’s use

KEY POINTS:

NIH Remdesivir Trial

  • RCT involving 1063 patients:
    • Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT)
    • Sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
    • Multicentered (including US, UK, and Singapore)
    • Started in February 2020
    • Current primary endpoint: Being well enough for hospital discharge or returning to normal activity level

Preliminary Data

  • Time to recovery
    • Median time to recovery: 11 days for remdesivir group vs 15 days for placebo group
    • 31% faster time to recovery in remdesivir group vs placebo (p<0.001)
  • Mortality Rate
    • 8.0% in remdesivir group vs 11.6% for the placebo group (p=0.059)
    • “Suggests benefit” but not statistically significant
  • Second (next) stage of trial
    • Remdesivir in combination with another agent | Likely to be a janus kinase inhibitor
  • One of the investigators (UK team) stated (April 30, 2020)

As far as the results are concerned, it’s cautious optimism

There is some effect but it is not a wonder effect

We have to find out when is the best time to give this drug, who benefits more

There is still a lot of data to come out of this trial

Learn More – Primary Sources:

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Issues Emergency Use Authorization for Potential COVID-19 Treatment

NIH clinical trial shows Remdesivir accelerates recovery from advanced COVID-19

Covid-19: Remdesivir is helpful but not a wonder drug, say researchers (BMJ)

AAP Recommendations: L&D Guidance and Management of Infants Born to COVID-19 Positive Mothers

NOTE: Information and guidelines may change rapidly. Check in with listed references in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ to best keep up to date

SUMMARY:

The AAP provides guidance on clinical issues related to the newborn when a mother has confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Neonates born to women with confirmed or pending COVID-19 results at delivery should be considered as persons under investigation (PUIs) for infection. The guideline also addresses particular areas of concern to healthcare professionals, such as PPE requirements for delivery

PPE Precautions if Mother has COVID-19

  • AAP specifically addresses the aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2 viral particles during delivery and states that, in addition to gown and gloves, N95 respiratory masks or air-purifying respirators that provide eye protection should be used

Rooming-In vs Separation

  • Mother with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 and well newborns can room-in
    • Risk of newborn infection is low if proper precautions are taken
  • A mother who is accutely ill may not be able to care for her infant
    • May be appropriate to temporarily separate mother and newborn or have the newborn cared for by non-infected caregivers in mother’s room

NICU Care of Exposed Infant

  • Admit to single-patient room
    • Ideal: Potential for negative pressure or air filtration system
    • If negative pressure unavailable or if individual space unavailable: Space by ≥6 feet and/or use air temperature-controlled isolettes
  • Intubation is an aerosol-generating procedure and therefore use either an N95 respiratory mask and eye protection goggles or an air-purifying respirator that provides eye protection

Mothers and Partners Visiting the NICU

  • If fully vaccinated who have then had an exposure
    • Do not exclude unless they develop symptoms consistent with SARS-CoV-2 infection
  • Confirmed COVID-19
    • Should not visit NICU infants while able to transmit SARS-CoV-2
    • Immunocompetent persons may be considered non-infectious if
      • Afebrile for 24 hours without use of antipyretics
      • At least 10 days have passed since symptoms first appeared (or, in the case of asymptomatic women identified only by obstetric screening tests, at least 10 days have passed since the positive test)
      • Symptoms have improved
  • Persons who are severely or critically ill with COVID-19
    • Should not enter the NICU until at least 20 days have passed since symptoms first appeared or first positive test
  • Severely immunocompromised and infected with SARS-CoV-2
    • Recommend consultation with your local infectious disease specialists for specific case management

Testing Newborns Prior to Discharge

  • Bathe newborns after birth to remove virus that may be on skin
  • Timing of testing for healthy newborns: At least once before discharge
    • 24 hours of age
    • Repeat at 48 hours
  • Procedure
    • Use one swab: Swab throat and then nasopharynx
  • If infant is positive
    • Test using combined throat/nasopharynx specimens every 48 to 72 hour intervals until there are 2 consecutive negative tests

KEY POINTS:

Hospital Discharge

  • Base discharge on a center’s normal criteria

Discharge Planning Based on Newborn Test Results

  • If infant can’t be tested
    • Treat as if positive for the virus for the 14-day observation period
    • Mother should maintain precautions until she meets the criteria for non-infectivity (see ‘Related ObG Topics’ below)
  • Positive test results
    • No symptoms: Plan for frequent outpatient follow-up (phone, telemedicine or in-office) through 14 days after birth
    • Follow CDC precautions to prevent household spread from infant to caregivers (see ‘Primary Sources – Learn More’ below)
  • Negative test results
    • Ideally, discharge to designated healthy caregiver
    • Mother should
      • Maintain ≥6 foot distance when possible
      • Use a mask and hand hygiene when directly caring for the infant  
    • The above transmission precautions should be used until
      • she has been afebrile for 24 hours without use of antipyretics
      • at least 10 days have passed since her symptoms first appeared (or, in the case of asymptomatic women identified only by obstetric screening tests, at least 10 days have passed since the positive test), and
      • symptoms have improved.
  • Other caregivers in the home who are have confirmed or suspected COVID-19
    • Should use standard procedural masks and hand hygiene when within 6 feet of the newborn until their own status is resolved

Learn More – Primary Sources:

AAP FAQs: Management of Infants Born to Mothers with Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19

CDC: If You Are Sick or Caring for Someone

COVID-19, ACE Inhibitors and ARBs: Professional Guidance and Evidence Update

NOTE: Information and guidelines may change rapidly. Check in with listed references in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ to best keep up to date

SUMMARY:

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The virus is known to target the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) co-receptor. Therefore, concern has been raised whether the use of common medications that impact ACE and the renin angiotensin system may also result in increased COVID-19 infection risk. Papers have been now been published demonstrating no increased risk with use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

High Risk Groups for COVID-19 infection

  • Patients at higher risk for significant morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 infection include older patients, especially those with chronic medical conditions such as the following
    • Pulmonary disease
    • Cardiac disease
    • Kidney disease
    • Diabetes
    • Hypertension
  • It is unclear whether the above associations are independently related to pathogenesis, other associated comorbidities, or even treatment
    • These disorders themselves are not necessarily independent and often appear together in patients, particularly in the context of the metabolic syndrome
  • ACE inhibitors, ARBs and other renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are commonly used in patients who would be considered ‘at risk’ for COVID-19

Angiotensin Converting Enzymes

  • ACE-1 and ACE-2 are two major enzymes found in the renin-angiotensin system
    • ACE enzymes play a critical role in the balance of peptides in the angiotensin family
    • ACE-2 is found on
      • Epithelial cells in both respiratory and GI tracts
      • Cardiac and kidney cells

ACE Inhibitors and ARBs

  • ACE inhibitors and ARBs
    • Strongly influence angiotensin peptides
    • Increase ACE-2 activity in cardiac tissue

What We Currently Know about SARS-CoV-2 Infectivity

  • SARS-CoV-2 is covered with crown-like glycoprotein spikes (hence ‘corona’) comprised of 2 subunits
    • Subunit S1: Binds to ACE-2 on the cell surface
    • Subunit S2: Fuses with the cell membrane
    • TMPRSS2 (host enzyme): Promotes cellular entry of the virus

Do ACE Inhibitors and ARBs Increase Risk for COVID-19?

  • ACE inhibitors, ARBs and other renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are commonly used in patients who would be considered ‘at risk’ for COVID-19
  • Theoretical risk raised
    • Because ACE inhibitors and ARBs ‘may’ increase expression of ACE-2 leading to greater risk for virus to enter and infect cells, could these medication lead to increased risk for COVID-19 morbidity and/or mortality?
  • Possible benefit
    • Study from China showed that while hypertension is a risk factor for COVID-19 mortality, patients on ACE inhibitors and ARBs did better (see review in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ below)
    • Underlying mechanism is unclear, but there may be a biphasic pattern: (1) In phase 1, these medications could increase infectivity (2) In phase 2, ACE-2 downregulation by the virus may be the “hallmark” of COVID-19 progression and therefore medications that upregulate in the second phase may be of benefit
    • In addition, there is a hypothesis that ACE-2 also stimulates one of the angiotensin peptides (angiotensin-(1-7)) that has positive anti-inflammatory effects | Therefore, medications that stimulate ACE-2 could have a beneficial effect

Current Evidence

  • Zhang et al. (Circ Res, 2020)
    • Retrospective, multi-centered study | 1128 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 | ACE Inhibitors/ARB group: 188
    • After adjustment, detected risk for all-cause mortality was lower in the ACE Inhibitors/ARB group compared to the non-ACE Inhibitors/ARB group
    • Adjusted hazard ratio: 0.42 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.92; p = 0.03)
    • These medications may be associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in the setting of COVID-19 compared to non-users
  • Reynolds et al. (NEJM, 2020)
    • 12,594 tested | 5894 patients positive for COVID-19 | Severe in 17%
    • Hypertension history: 34.6% of tested patients | 59.1% were COVID-19 positive had a positive test | Severe in 24.6%
    • Authors conclude that there was no association with likelihood of a positive test or severity of illness
  • Mancia et al. (NEJM, 2020)
    • Population-based case–control study | 6272 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection
    • Use of ARBs or ACE inhibitors did not show any association with Covid-19 overall or those with severe or fatal disease
  • Editorial (Jarcho et al. NEJM, 2020)
    • The accompanying editorial recognizes limitations inherent in observational data
    • However, these studies support professional guidance that recommend against altering these medications when indicated
    • Furthermore, the editorial authors state

Taken together, these three studies do not provide evidence to support the hypothesis that ACE inhibitor or ARB use is associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the risk of severe Covid-19 among those infected, or the risk of in-hospital death among those with a positive test. 

KEY POINTS:

Recommendations

  • Guidance is based on the current lack of evidence that ACE inhibitors or ARBs increase risk of infection or result in a more severe course of COVID-19 disease
    • It is acknowledged that new data may result in a future update to these guidelines
  • Professional recommendations do not support stopping or changing medications for patients who are currently being treated with ACE inhibitors or ARBs
  • In addition, cessation is associated potential for significant harms including
    • Medical risk: Exacerbation of underlying medical conditions
    • Infection risk: Due to increased pharmacy encounters, visits for blood work etc.
  • The HFSA/ACC/AHA recommends

…continuation of RAAS antagonists for those patients who are currently prescribed such agents for indications for which these agents are known to be beneficial, such as heart failure, hypertension, or ischemic heart disease

In the event patients with cardiovascular disease are diagnosed with COVID-19, individualized treatment decisions should be made according to each patient’s hemodynamic status and clinical presentation

Therefore, be advised not to add or remove any RAAS-related treatments, beyond actions based on standard clinical practice

Learn More – Primary Sources:

Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients with Covid-19 (Vaduganathan et al., NEJM)

Drugs and the renin-angiotensin system in covid-19 (BMJ)

HFSA/ACC/AHA Statement Addresses Concerns Re: Using RAAS Antagonists in COVID-19

COVID-19: An ACP Physician’s Guide and Resources

European Medicines Agency: EMA advises continued use of medicines for hypertension, heart or kidney disease during COVID-19 pandemic

British Society for Heart Failure (BHF) and British Cardiology Society (BCS): Statement on ACI Inhibitors and ARBs in COVID-19

Association of Inpatient Use of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers with Mortality Among Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized With COVID-19 (Zhang et al. Circ Res, 2020)

Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Risk of Covid-19 (Reynolds et al. NEJM, 2020)

Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Blockers and the Risk of Covid-19 (Mancia et al. NEJM, 2020)

Inhibitors of the Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System and Covid-19 (Editorial. NEJM 2020)

COVID-19 and Coagulopathy: ISTH Issues Guidance on Diagnosis and Management

NOTE: Information and guidelines may change rapidly. Check in with listed references in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ to best keep up to date

SUMMARY:

The ISTH released guidance on the recognition and management of coagulopathy in the setting of COVID-19. The ISTH emphasizes the term ‘interim’ as the medical community continues to learn more about the clinical course of those infected with SARS-CoV-2. The stated goal of this guidance is

…to provide a risk stratification at admission for a COVID‐19 patient and management of coagulopathy which may develop in some of these patients, based on easily available laboratory parameters

Recommended Labs at Admission (decreasing order of importance)

D-dimers

  • Consider hospital admission for patients with markedly raised D-dimers even in absence of other severity symptoms
    • “Arbitrarily defined as three-four fold increase”
    • High levels indicate increased thrombin generation

Note: This guidance does not address pregnancy specifically | D-dimer is elevated in normal pregnancy (see ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ below)

Prothrombin time (PT)

  • Current literature is demonstrating mild prolongation of PT at admission in ICU vs non-ICU cohorts (e.g., 12·2 s vs 10·7 s; Huang et al. Lancet, 2020)
  • Caution: Such “subtle changes” will not be as readily identified if PT is reported as INR

Thrombocytopenia

  • Unlike typical sepsis, thrombocytopenia at admission for COVID-19 was not as strong an indicator of sepsis mortality
  • The authors state that “thrombocytopenia at presentation may be but not consistent prognosticator”

Monitoring Coagulation Markers

  • Monitor D-dimers, platelet count, PT and fibrinogen to identify worsening coagulopathy
    • Worsening parameters: “More aggressive critical care support is warranted” including consideration of ‘experimental’ therapies and blood product support
    • Stable or improving parameters: Provides “added confidence for stepdown of treatment if corroborating with the clinical condition”

DIC

  • Importance of regular laboratory monitoring
    • Day 4: In one study (Tang et al. J Thromb Haemost, 2020), DIC was much more likely to develop on day 4 among nonsurvivors vs survivors (71.4% vs 0.6%)
  • Days 10 and 14: Statistically significant increase in D-dimer levels, and PT, and decrease in fibrinogen levels were likewise seen in nonsurvivors

KEY POINTS:

Management Points

  • Inhibition of thrombin generation may reduce risk for multi-organ failure in the setting of sepsis

Prophylactic LMWH

  • “Should be considered in ALL patients (including non-critically ill) who require hospital admission for COVID-19 infection, in the absence of any contraindications (active bleeding and platelet count less than 25 x 109 /L)”
  • Monitor closely if severe renal impairment is present
  • “Abnormal PT or APTT is not a contraindication”
  • Additional benefits of LMWH include
    • VTE prevention
    • Anti-inflammatory properties

Parameter Thresholds

  • Non-bleeding patients: Maintain
    • Platelet count >20 x 109/L
    • Fibrinogen >2.0 g/L
  • Bleeding patients (rare in setting of COVID-19): Maintain
    • Platelet count >50 x 109/L
    • Fibrinogen >2.0 g/L
    • PT ratio <1.5 (note: not the same as INR)

Other therapies to manage coagulopathy

  • Should be considered experimental, for example
    • Antithrombin supplementation | Recombinant thrombomodulin | Hydroxychloroquine

Lancet Haematology – Expert Opinion

Hospitalized Patients (Severe COVID-19)

  • Closely monitor patient for coagulopathy: Repeat every 2–3 days
    • D-dimer
    • PT
    • Platelet counts
  • Administer subcutaneous LMWH for all hospitalized patients
    • Evidence to support this practice in severe COVID-19 | “In view of the hypercoagulable state of patients with severe COVID-19, and the potential increased risk of thrombosis, we suggest that all patients with COVID-19 that are admitted to hospital should receive this prophylactic treatment in the absence of medical contraindications”
  • Be on alert for VTE
    • Consider VTE in the setting of rapid respiratory deterioration and/or high D-dimer concentrations
    • CT angiography or ultrasound of the venous system of the lower extremities

Note: If diagnostic testing is not possible and there are no bleeding risk factors, consider therapeutic anticoagulation | Experimental therapies such as plasma exchange, or administration of other anticoagulants or anti-inflammatory drugs should only be undertaken via clinical trials

Learn More – Primary Sources:

ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID‐19

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China (Huang et al. Lancet 2020)

Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (Tang et al. J Thromb Haemost, 2020)

D-dimer During Pregnancy: Establishing Trimester-Specific Reference Intervals

Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 (Lancet Haematology Expert Comment)

Critical Care Medicine: Coagulopathy of Coronavirus Disease 2019

COVID-19 Table of Contents

Updated by the team at The ObG Project

Index

COVID-19 Entries

COVID-19: Pregnancy Guidelines  

COVID-19: GYN Guidelines

COVID-19: Management Guidelines 

#GrandRounds Research Summaries

COVID-19 and Women’s Health 

COVID-19 Management  

COVID-19 Transmission & Testing 

COVID-19 Clinical Features 

COVID-19 Clinical Outcomes

Managing an Obstetric Office Practice During COVID-19

NOTE: Information and guidelines may change rapidly. Check in with listed references in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ to best keep up to date

SUMMARY:

Boelig et al. (AJOG MFM, 2020) provide a helpful (and necessary) overview, including suggestions for managing obstetrical workflows during the COVID-19 pandemic. The focus is not only on MFM practice; the authors also provide multiple proposals that may ease congestion and limit viral spread. Note that the following summary reflects ‘Expert Review’. Professional society and organization COVID-19 guidelines may differ.



Patient with Symptoms

  • Pregnancy alone warrants testing (if influenza negative)
    • “Especially if additional risk factors”
  • Triage via telehealth to determine if additional supportive care is required
    • Mild symptoms do not require in-person assessment
    • Self-isolate for 14 days (i.e., assume infection unless confirmed otherwise)
    • Use drive-through testing or stand-alone testing rather than in-person office visits/testing
  • If patient does come to the office and is symptomatic, assume infection | CDC recommends that

Patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 should be asked to wear a surgical mask as soon as they are identified and be evaluated in a private room with the door closed

Healthcare personnel entering the room should use Standard and Transmission-based Precautions

Altering the Standard OB Visit Schedule

Visits Without Face-to-Face Interactions

  • Intake Visit
    • Can be done by telehealth unless urgency to visit
    • In general, the authors recommend taking advantage of telehealth opportunities if possible
  • 16, 24 and 34 weeks
    • Use telehealth
  • Postpartum
    • Photos can be used to assess wounds and other issues (e.g., mastitis) and uploaded via patient portals

In-Person Antenatal Visit Schedule

  • <11 weeks
    • Telephone OB intake
    • Consider earlier if at risk for ectopic
  • 11-13 weeks
    • Ultrasound for dating and aneuploidy screening (if not scanned previously | If proven viability, cfDNA (NIPS) could obviate need for ultrasound
    • OB labs
  • 20 weeks
    • Structural fetal anatomy ultrasound
  • 28 weeks
    • Appropriate labs (e.g., GDM screening) and vaccines
  • 32 weeks
    • Ultrasound (if indicated)
  • 36 weeks
    • Ultrasound (if indicated)
    • GBS/HIV screen
  • 37 weeks until delivery
    • Weekly visits

Additional Considerations

  • Use home BP monitoring where possible
  • Use low volume blood drawing centers if feasible

KEY POINTS

  • The authors provide some general points and suggested abbreviated visit schedules for ultrasound and fetal assessment to limit exposure and protect the health of patients and obstetric professionals
  • MFM practices and obstetrical units may alter their routine scheduling patterns for high risk OB patients based on resources and local policies | The authors’ modified schedules can be found in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ below

Prenatal Ultrasound

  • Dating
    • cfDNA is an option for aneuploidy testing if patient has had an early first trimester ultrasound and viability is established
  • Anatomy (Early 2nd trimester to 22 weeks)
    • Consider limiting follow-up views to 4 to 8 weeks vs usual 1 to 2 weeks
    • If only a single view or 2 views are missing (example given: lumbar sacral spine not well seen but posterior fossa is within normal, which would strongly suggest absence of NTD)
    • BMI>40: Schedule later in pregnancy (e.g., 22 weeks) to avoid need for follow up due to missing views
  • Additional ultrasound testing
    • Third trimester growth scan: 32 weeks
    • previa/low lying placenta: 34-36 weeks
  • Authors suggest using telehealth for ultrasound counseling where possible, especially in the absence of a new onset finding

NSTs and BPPs

  • Authors suggest minimizing NST visits or using alternative fetal assessment methods where possible
    • NSTs 2x per week should be limited to IUGR with abnormal Doppler flows
    • NSTs initiated <32 weeks should be avoided when possible
    • Avoid NST and use BPP if a patient is already undergoing an ultrasound assessment
  • Kick counts
    • Consider as an alternative to NST in lower risk patients, such as
      • Women age 35 to 39
      • BMI>40 (uncomplicated)
  • Gestational hypertension or preeclampsia
    • Weekly office visit and daily home blood pressure monitoring

Learn More – Primary Sources:

MFM Guidance for COVID-19 (Boelig et al. AJOG MFM, 2020)

CDC: Healthcare Professionals Frequently Asked Questions and Answers

SMFM: COVID-19 in Pregnancy: Preparing your Obstetrical Units

ISUOG Webinar: How to prepare your unit for Coronavirus

Social Distancing for Outpatient OB Ultrasonographers and Nurses

COVID-19, PPE and Second Stage of Labor: Current US Guidance

NOTE: Information and guidelines may change rapidly. Check in with listed references in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ to best keep up to date

SUMMARY:

Multiple societies and experts have weighed in on whether second stage of labor and delivery warrants respirators (e.g., N95 masks) vs surgical masks in the setting of a patient with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. The lack of clarity currently revolves around whether the second stage of labor should be considered an aerosol-generating event. ACOG, SMFM and multiple other ObGyn societies have sent a letter to the CDC requesting clarification (summarized under ‘Key Points’ below).

CDC

  • CDC advises healthcare personnel to use
    • Gloves
    • Gowns
    • Airborne precautions
    • Eye protection (e.g., goggles or a face shield)
  • Face masks are an acceptable alternative when the supply chain of N95 respirators (or similar respirators that filter inspired air and offer respiratory protection) cannot meet the demand
  • NIOSH-approved filtering facepiece respirators, half facepiece or full facepiece elastomeric respirators, and powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) where feasible “might be considered”
    • However, they should not be used during surgery because exhaled air may contaminate the sterile field
  • If respirators are in short supply, priority should be given to aerosol-generating procedures (e.g., intubation)
  • CDC  addresses alternatives in the setting of face mask shortages on the page entitled Strategies for Optimizing the Supply of Facemasks (see ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’)
  • CDC guidance states

Based on limited data, forceful exhalation during the second stage of labor would not be expected to generate aerosols to the same extent as procedures more commonly considered to be aerosol generating (such as bronchoscopy, intubation, and open suctioning)

Forceful exhalation during the second stage of labor is not considered an aerosol-generating procedure for respirator prioritization during shortages over procedures more likely to generate higher concentrations of infectious respiratory aerosols

When the supply chain is restored, facilities with a respiratory protection program should return to use of respirators for patients with known or suspected COVID-19

ACOG

  • Healthcare providers should use PPE, including respirators or face masks, goggles, gowns and gloves | N95 respirators should be used for aerosol-generating procedures
  • ACOG states that “COVID-19 infection is highly contagious, and this must be taken into consideration when planning intrapartum care”
  • In addition to wearing appropriate PPE, respirators (e.g., N95 masks) should be worn by “All medical staff caring for potential or confirmed COVID-19 patients” when available
  • In the setting of limited infection protections “physicians are not ethically obligated to provide care to high-risk patients without protections in place”
  • PPE: ACOG restates CDC guidance
    • Respirators (e.g., N95 respirators) should be used when caring for patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19
    • Aerosol-generating procedures should be prioritized during shortages
    • ACDC currently does not consider second stage an aerosol-generating procedure and adds the following

ACOG continues to review questions and data regarding the potential for aerosolization in the context of forceful exhalation during the second stage of labor 

SMFM/SOAP

  • Respirators (N95 masks)
    • Should be used in any room where there is performance or anticipation of aerosol-generating procedure for patient with confirmed COVID-19 or PUI
    • Examples of potential aerosol-generating events include
      • Cesarean deliveries
      • PPH
      • Intubation
  • Second stage of labor
    • Suggestions to limit exposure include
      • Use of surgical drapes as an added barrier during second stage and delivery | Check with local infection control regarding reuse of N95 masks
    • In addition, SMFM/SOAP believes it is “reasonable” to

…consider N95 mask use for HCWs caring for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in the second stage of labor, including specifically HCWs with significant and prolonged exposure to such patients

As with all resource considerations and potential supply and demand imbalances, the ability to adhere to this suggestion will need to be evaluated on an institutional level. It is acknowledged that this suggestion is above and beyond current CDC recommendations

SOGH

  • The SOGH COVID-19 statement is based on the following
    • Obstetricians are frontline personnel
    • Asymptomatic patients on L&D can potentially infect frontline personnel, especially as there is close contact between patients and healthcare professionals during labor
    • The science behind COVID-19 transmission continues to evolve
  • As a result of the above, SOGH recommends

Universal use of hospital masks on Labor and Delivery, for staff, patients and visitors

Universal testing for Covid19 of all pregnant women and their chosen support person/s on Labor and Delivery, where available

Use of full PPE, including N95 masks and face shields, for the second stage of labor for all Covid positive women and persons under investigation or for all women, when universal testing is not available

AAP

  • AAP provides PPE guidance in the setting of a birth when the mother is COVID-19 positive
  • Aside from gown and gloves, AAP recommends that staff should use

Either an N95 respiratory mask and eye protection goggles or with an air-purifying respirator that provides eye protection

The protection is needed due to the likelihood of maternal virus aerosols and the potential need to perform newborn resuscitation that can generate aerosols

AWHONN

  • AWHONN recommends the following based on the fact that data on second stage is still limited and universal testing is not widely available

Healthcare personnel caring for women in the second stage of labor are in close contact for long periods of time to provide support for breathing and pushing

AWHONN recommends all healthcare personnel wear appropriate PPE during the second stage of labor, including use of N95 masks when caring for women who are known or suspected (PUI) COVID-19

Until universal testing is available, health care personnel should have the option to use N95 masks when caring for all women in the second stage of labor

KEY POINTS:

Letter to CDC Requesting Clarification

  • Sent jointly from the following societies
    • AAGL | ACNM | ACOG | ASRM | AUGS | AWHONN | NANPWH | SMFM | SFP | SGS
  • The letter requests clarification from the CDC regarding PPE use on L&D, specifically second stage of labor
  • The societies raise concern that the current CDC recommendations are

…being interpreted as suggesting that obstetric care clinicians need not wear N95 masks and face shields when attending to patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 during the second stage of labor

We appreciate your clarification that the CDC recommends use of such PPE and look forward to working with you to amplify this message

‘Expert Review’

Boelig et al. AJOG MFM, 2020

  • Some centers consider N95 masks to be appropriate
    • In addition to droplet precaution PPE for any patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and
    • For any patient, regardless of respiratory symptoms, during indispensable aerosolizing procedures, including second stage of labor

Palatnik and McIntosh. Am J Perinatol, 2020

  • The authors recommend that healthcare professionals during second stage be provided with N95 respirators
  • The authors make the point that there are important factors to consider specifically regarding the second stage of labor and patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19
    • Time: To avoid cesarean delivery, patients can be allowed up to 4 hours (nulliparous) and 3 hours (multiparous) in second stage
    • Distance: Healthcare personnel will likely be within 6 feet of the patient and likely closer when patient is pushing
  • Furthermore, the authors state that that patients will be “exerting extreme effort during the second stage of labor and frequently blow out their breath, cough, shout, and vomit, all of which put the health care team at risk”

Learn More – Primary Sources:

CDC: Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings

CDC: Clinical Questions about COVID-19: Questions and Answers

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Society for Obstetric and Anesthesia and Perinatology – Labor and Delivery COVID-19 Considerations

ACOG COVID-19 FAQs for Obstetrician-Gynecologists, Obstetrics

Labor and Delivery Guidance for COVID-19 (Boelig et al. AJOG MFM, 2020)

AAP issues guidance on infants born to mothers with suspected or confirmed COVID-19

AWHONN: COVID-19 Practice Guidance

Letter From Professional ObGyn Societies to the CDC

SOGH COVID-19 Position Statement

Protecting Labor and Delivery Personnel from COVID-19 during the Second Stage of Labor (Palatnik and McIntosh. Am J Perinatol, 2020)

The Right Mask for the Task

COVID-19: The SMFM/SOAP Guidelines for Labor and Delivery

NOTE: Information and guidelines may change rapidly. Check in with listed references in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ to best keep up to date

SUMMARY:

SMFM and Society for Obstetric and Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP) have released COVID-19 guidelines for obstetric professionals, including anesthesiologists. The following are highlights. The complete document link can be found in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’. The guideline is not proscriptive with an understanding that they “may not apply in your clinical setting”

Initial Assessment and Intake

  • Initial assessment performed upon patient arrival
    • Personnel should maintain distance (>6 feet if possible)
    • Limit duration of encounter
    • Limit number of support persons
      • Develop policies locally | There may be state restrictions as well
      • Screen visitors for symptoms of respiratory illness before entering the healthcare facility
      • Provide exceptions for bereavement
  • Log staff entering and leaving cohorted rooms
  • Consider staggering staff schedule to limit exposure
    • Example: Rotate telehealth team with in-person team every 2 weeks
  • Testing of women admitted to labor and delivery
    • Prioritize pregnant women with exposure to or symptoms of COVID-19
    • Universal testing “may be considered due to the potential for asymptomatic patients to present, particularly in areas of high community prevalence

Patient Rooms

  • Confirmed COVID-19 and PUI: “Ideally” should be placed in isolation room
  • Airborne infection isolation rooms
    • In general
      • Droplet and contact precautions
    • If aerosol-generating procedure is anticipated
      • Single-patient negative-pressure rooms | Minimum of 6 air changes per hour
  • “Crash Rooms”
    • Negative-pressure ORs should not have open surgical equipment

PPE for Health Care Workers

Women with Confirmed Covid-19 Or PUI

  • Should wear a surgical mask

Health Care Workers Caring for Women Who are Positive for SARS-CoV2 or PUIs

  • Use droplet and contact precautions with eye protection: Gown | Gloves | Surgical mask | Face shield or goggles
  • High-risk obstetrical scenarios
    • Use respirators (e.g., N95 masks) in any room where there is performance or anticipation of aerosol generating procedure (e.g., intubation)
    • Obstetrical examples include
      • Cesarean deliveries
      • Twin vaginal deliveries
      • Women brought to OR for management of PPH
      • Intubation (actual or anticipated)
  • Second stage of labor and deep respiratory effort
    • SMFM/SOAP states that healthcare workers

…should use N95 (or facemasks if N95 is not available), eye protection, gloves, and gowns during the second stage of labor, in addition to other personal protective equipment that may be typically indicated for labor and delivery

Surgical drapes could be used as an additional physical respiratory droplet barrier during the second stage and at delivery

KEY POINTS:

Preterm Medications

  • Antenatal corticosteroids
    • Use with caution in ICU/acute care setting
    • Balance risks and benefits and adjust protocols accordingly (e.g., >34 weeks and repeat courses)
  • Magnesium for fetal neuroprotection
    • Concern regarding maternal respiratory depression | Adjust accordingly based on clinical scenario, including gestational age and increasing maternal oxygen demands
    • Assess renal function | If mild respiratory distress, single 4 g bolus “may serve as an alternative”
  • NSAIDs restriction
    • Document considers restricting NSAIDs to be controversial because data lacking to support this practice
  • Prenatal ultrasonography
    • Use in settings where sonography would likely impact care

Labor and Delivery

  • Follow standard guidelines for the following practices (based on availability, which may change over time)
    • Amniotomy
    • Internal monitoring (may change with more data but currently no evidence that there is an increased risk for transmission)
    • Operative vaginal deliveries
    • Magnesium for preeclampsia/seizure prophylaxis
      • In absence of severe features of preeclampsia, “avoidance of magnesium seems prudent”
      • Be cognizant of potential renal dysfunction and adjusts dosing accordingly
    • Epidural
      • Consider early epidural to mitigate risks of general anesthesia including increased risk of aerosol-generating procedures such as intubation
  • Nitrous Oxide
    • Currently, limited data regarding use of nitrous oxide in patients with COVID-19
    • Patients with confirmed COVID-19 | Suspected COVID-19 | Unconfirmed COVID-19 negative status
      • “…may consider suspending use of nitrous oxide”
    • Patients with COVID-19 confirmed negative result
      • Nitrous oxide remains an option
  • Oxygen for fetal indications
    • While considered controversial, “suspend” use of high flow nasal cannula or face mask | Consider oxygen in the setting of maternal hypoxia
  • Worsening maternal respiratory status
    • Uterine decompression to improve maternal respiratory status
      • Data are unclear
    • Risk for fetal hypoxemia
      • Must be balanced against risks of preterm birth and maternal compromise

Postpartum Care

  • CDC recommendation regarding mother/infant separation has been updated since SMFM/SOAP Statement posted
    • CDC guideline now recommends that separation be based on ‘shared decision making’ | For those mothers who wish to room in, use mask/gloves and maintaining bassinet distance
    • Use expedited testing to determine COVID-19 status
  • Breastfeeding
    • Breastfeeding (with appropriate precautions) or pumping for women for confirmed COVID-19 or PUI is recommended
    • The document notes there may be risk to infant associated with direct breast feeding
  • NSAIDs
    • Increased risk with opioids vs NSAIDs
    • The document states “For women who are asymptomatic, mildly symptomatic, or moderately symptomatic who require analgesic medication beyond acetaminophen, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be used if there are no other contraindications because systemic opioids likely pose more clinical risks”
  • Postpone postpartum tubal ligations if alternatives available
  • Circumcisions
    • Infants are considered PUIs
    • Decision “should be made in communication with the pediatric team, and appropriate PPE must be worn”

Learn More – Primary Sources

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Society for Obstetric and Anesthesia and Perinatology – Labor and Delivery COVID-19 Considerations

Ultrasound and COVID-19: AIUM and WFUMB Guidance on Transmission Precautions

NOTE: Information and guidelines may change rapidly. Check in with listed references in ‘Learn More – Primary Sources’ to best keep up to date

SUMMARY:

Various organizations have released documents to help ultrasound units navigate practical issues during the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) has released guidance, adapted from the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB). Due to the lack of data, the authors of these documents point out that statements should be considered ‘suggestions’ vs evidence-based guidance. In addition, they note that individual ultrasound practices should refer to their local governments and/or CDC.

General Precautions

  • “Implement both standard and transmission-based precautions, regardless of suspected or confirmed COVID-19”
    • Transmission-based precautions for ultrasound practitioners include
      • Surgical mask | Gloves | Gown | Eye protection
  • Consider every patient to be potentially SARS-CoV-2 infected
  • To limit risk of transmission
    • Lengthen appointment times
    • Minimize patients in waiting room and maintain ≥6 foot spacing
    • Give patients and caregivers masks on arrival
    • No visitors in the exam room
      • AIUM includes students and trainees among those who should not be in the exam room
    • Rooms should be cleaned and disinfected as if each person has COVID-19

If patient known or suspected COVID-19 positive

  • Respiratory protection
    • Use respirators (e.g., N95) rather than surgical masks when exposed to aerosol-generating procedure (e.g., intubation) especially in ICU
  • Eye protection
  • Gloves
  • Gowns (in case of shortage, prioritize for aerosol-generating procedures)
  • AIUM states

As ultrasound practitioners are in close contact with patients, surgical facemasks are essential to offer protection

These must be put on before entry into the patient room or care area

When available, N95 respirators or respirators that offer a higher level of protection should be used instead of a facemask when performing or present for an aerosol-generating procedure, particularly for use in the intensive care unit

KEY POINTS:

  • Hand hygiene
    • Perform hand hygiene before and after the following
      • All patient contact
      • Contact with potentially infectious material (e.g. linen from patient room)
      • Removing PPE (including gloves)
    • Method
      • Alcohol-based hand rub (60-95% alcohol) or
      • Soap and water (≥20 seconds) | Use soap prior to alcohol-based hand rub if hands soiled
    • Use latex free disposable gloves during the exam | Change between each patient
    • One hand on transducer and other on keyboard
      • Hand on keyboard is considered ‘semiclean’ because there may potentially be virus caught in the crevices of the machine | Use this ‘semiclean’ hand to apply gel
      • Between cases: Clean bottle and wipe down touched surfaces with low-level disinfectant (LLD)
  • Additional precautions include
    • Ultrasound practitioners with underlying health problems (i.e., those disorders included in ‘at risk’ category): Limit exposure where possible
    • Ensure infection control training and fit testing for respirators (e.g. N95) if needed
  • Patients in isolation (confirmed or suspected COVID-19)
    • Use PPE prior to entering room
    • Respirator (e.g., N95) or facemask | goggle or face protective shield | Surgical gown | Gloves

Transducer Cleaning and Disinfection

  • Non-critical devices (low risk)
    • Transducers that come into contact with intact skin
    • Us a low or intermediate level disinfection, which will denature most bacteria, some fungi and some viruses, such as COVID-19, influenza A and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Semi-critical devices (medium risk)
    • Transducers that come into contact with non-intact skin, blood, body fluids and mucous membranes (e.g., vaginal probes)
    • Use a high-level disinfection (HLD) method
    • Single-use transducer cover is mandatory
  • Critical devices (high risk)
    • Transducers used for invasive procedures (e.g. needle guidance during biopsies, aspirations, drainages) and possible risk of blood or body fluid exposure
    • Use sterilization (if compatible) or HLD
    • Sterile transducer covers are mandatory
  • The WFUMB states that the only change in the context of COVID-19 is that

…all external probes must undergo cleaning followed by low level disinfection to denature any presence of SARS-CoV-2 e.g. transducers used for transabdominal scanning, lung ultrasound or in the pediatric or emergency department setting

It is important to note that the low level disinfectant for COVID-19 is approved for use on ultrasound transducers and has proven viricidal efficacy

Learn More – Primary Sources:

AIUM: Quick Guide on COVID-19 Protections —Patient and Ultrasound Provider Protection

WFUMB Position Statement: How to perform a safe ultrasound examination and clean equipment in the context of COVID-19

The Law and Limits of Quarantine during Covid-19 Pandemic

Covid-19 has circumnavigated the globe at a rapid pace. Governments and healthcare officials are struggling with the mounting waves of cases and how to effectively manage the crisis. Public movement has been, and continues to be, a prime area for management. Quarantines and travel bans have been implemented during the pandemic, and are subject to change.

Public Health Definitions

  • Quarantine
    • In public health practice, “quarantine” refers to the separation of persons (or communities) who have been exposed to an infectious disease
  • Isolation
    • In contrast, isolation applies to the separation of persons who are known to be infected

Legal Definition (US Law)

  • US law uses the word “quarantine” to refer to both types of interventions and travel limits
  • Isolation and quarantine can be voluntary or imposed by law

States have the power and authority to implement these restrictions in response to a public health threat. For example, the tristate area of New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut have a coordinated approach of asking its residents to ‘self-quarantine’ at home even if healthy, preventing large gatherings, and closing nonessential retail businesses.

Federal government can intervene as well, but its power is limited. Quarantine is an option at the federal level if there is a concern related to disease spread over state lines or national borders. For example, nonessential travel between the United States and its neighbors Mexico and Canada has been restricted. In general, courts will be reluctant to interfere unless the quarantine is unreasonable or appears motivated by racial animus. For example, a quarantine during the bubonic plague of 1900 in San Francisco was struck down as being racially motivated and not suited to prevent spread of disease. On the other hand, two California universities were permitted to quarantine faculty and students during a measles outbreak.

While these measures of social distancing are necessary, immediate funding for medical supplies, PPE, and testing kits, along with expansion of hospital bed numbers (e.g., reopening of closed hospitals or developing temporary facilities) are vital to stemming the wave of morbidity and mortality that is flooding the U.S. healthcare system. As of this writing, Congress has authorized several aid packages that mandate private health plans to provide coverage for COVID-19 diagnostic testing, including the cost of a provider, urgent care center, and emergency room visits in order to receive testing; coverage without cost sharing for COVID-19 testing and screening provided during a telehealth office visit; and approved personal respiratory protective devices as covered countermeasures.

This topic will be updated to reflect significant policy shifts.

Learn More – Primary Sources

Covid-19 — The Law and Limits of Quarantine

Quarantine, isolation and the duty of easy rescue in public health

Protecting Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Coronavirus Outbreak –Lessons from Taiwan’s SARS response

New York State Modifies and Suspends Laws Related to Medical Oversight and Liability During COVID-19 Pandemic

Governor Andrew Cuomo issued an executive order on March 23, 2020 that modified certain sections of the state’s education laws to eliminate any obstacle to the provision of supplies and medical treatment, in order to ensure that the New York healthcare system has adequate capacity to provide care to all who need it

Some modifications and suspensions include

  • To allow any emergency medical treatment protocol development or modification to occur solely with the approval of the Commissioner of Health
  • To permit a physician assistant to provide medical services appropriate to their education, training and experience without oversight from a supervising physician, without civil or criminal penalty related to a lack of oversight by a supervising physician
  • To permit a specialist assistant to provide medical services appropriate to their education, training and experience without oversight from a supervising physician, without civil or criminal penalty related to a lack of oversight by a supervising physician
  • To permit a nurse practitioner to provide medical services appropriate to their education, training and experience, without a written practice agreement, or collaborative relationship with a physician, without civil or criminal penalty related to a lack of written practice agreement or collaborative relationship with a physician
  • To provide that all physicians, physician assistants, specialist assistants, nurse practitioners, licensed registered professional nurses and licensed practical nurses shall be immune from civil liability for any injury or death alleged to have been sustained directly as a result of an act or omission by such medical professional in the course of providing medical services in support of the State’s response to the COVID-19 outbreak, unless it is established that such injury or death was caused by the gross negligence of such medical professional

Learn More – Primary Sources

Executive Order No. 202.10: Continuing Temporary Suspension and Modification of Laws Relating to the Disaster Emergency