• About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    • ObGFirst
  • COVID-19
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • GrandRounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • Now@ObG
  • Media
About Us Contact Us Login ObGFirst
  • COVID-19
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • GrandRounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • Now@ObG
  • Media
Grand Rounds

Does Simulation Training Reduce Rates of Medical Malpractice Claims Among Ob-Gyns?

image_pdfFavoriteLoadingFavorite

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

  • Data suggests that 40.5% of pregnancy-related deaths in the US are preventable
  • Schaffer et al. (Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021) compared malpractice claim rates before and after participation in simulation training

METHODS:

  • Retrospective analysis
  • Population
    • Obstetrician-gynecologists insured by the same malpractice insurer
    • 10 different institutions around the Boston area | 30% academic
    • Attended one or more simulation training sessions from 2002 to 2019
  • Exposure
    • Simulation training
  • Study design
    • Simulation focused on team training and crisis management rather than surgical or technical skills
    • High-acuity, low-frequency cases with immediate debriefings: e.g., “acute postpartum maternal compromise requiring life-saving interventions”
    • Claim rates were calculated and expressed as claims per 100 physician coverage years
  • Primary outcome
    • Claim rates before and after simulation training
      • Over entire study period
      • 2 years pre and post training
      • 1 year pre and post training
  • Secondary outcomes
    • Indemnity payment amounts
    • Percent of claims paid
    • Injury severity

RESULTS:

  • 292 physicians
  • Compared with presimulation training, malpractice claim rates were significantly lower postsimulation training for
    • The full study period (P<0.001)
      • Pre training: 11.2 claims per 100 physician coverage years
      • Post training: 5.7 claims per 100 physician coverage years
    • The 2 years pre and post training (P=0.043)
      • Pre training: 9.2 per 100 physician coverage years
      • Post training: 5.4 per 100 physician coverage years
  • For the 1 year presimulation and postsimulation training comparison, the decrease in claim rates was nonsignificant (P=0.162)
    • Pre training: 8.8 claims per 100 physician coverage years
    • Post training: 5.3 claims per 100 physician coverage years
  • Attending more than one simulation session was associated with a greater reduction in claim rates
  • Postsimulation claim rates were lower for physicians who attended more than one simulation session (P<0.001)
    • One simulation session: 6.3 per 100 physician coverage years
    • Two simulation sessions: 2.1 per 100 physician coverage years
    • Three simulation sessions: 1.3 per 100 physician coverage years
  • Compared with presimulation training, there was no significant difference in
    • The median or mean indemnity paid
    • Percent of claims on which an indemnity payment was made
    • Median severity of injury

CONCLUSION:

  • There were significantly fewer malpractice claims after ob-gyns underwent simulation training
  • Claim rates were further reduced when physicians attended multiple sessions
  • The authors state

Given the ongoing need for improvement in patient safety within obstetrics and gynecology, and the large size of the indemnity awards the risk of which could potentially be reduced after simulation training, the more widespread use of simulation training within obstetrics and gynecology should be considered

Learn More – Primary Sources:

Association of Simulation Training With Rates of Medical Malpractice Claims Among Obstetrician–Gynecologists

Want to stay on top of key guidelines and research papers?

ObGFirst® – Try It Free! »

image_pdfFavoriteLoadingFavorite
< Previous
All Grand Rounds Posts
Next >

Related ObG Topics:

Is There a Link Between Greater Risk of Malpractice Liability and Better Quality Health Care?
Traditional vs. Simulation Training for Laparoscopic Salpingectomy
Meta-analysis Results: Do Shoulder Dystocia Simulations Reduce the Prevalence of Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy?

Sections

  • COVID-19
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • Grand Rounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • Now@ObG
  • Media

Are you an
ObG Insider?

Get specially curated clinical summaries delivered to your inbox every week for free

  • Site Map/
  • © ObG Project/
  • Terms and Conditions/
  • Privacy/
  • Contact Us/
© ObG Project
SSL Certificate


  • Already an ObGFirst Member?
    Welcome back

    Log In

    Want to sign up?
    Get guideline notifications
    CME Included

    Sign Up

Download Your ObG App
HERE!

Sign In

Lost your password?

Sign Up for ObGFirst and Stay Ahead

  • - Professional guideline notifications
  • - Daily summary of a clinically relevant
    research paper
  • - Includes 1 hour of CME every month

ObGFirst Free Trial

Already a Member of ObGFirst®?

Please log in to ObGFirst to access the 2T US Atlas

Password Trouble?

Not an ObGFirst® Member Yet?

  • - Access 2T US Atlas
  • - Guideline notifications
  • - Daily research paper summaries
  • - And lots more!
ObGFirst Free Trial

Media - Internet

Computer System Requirements

OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.

Disclosure of Unlabeled Use

This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.

The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.

Disclaimer

Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.

Jointly provided by

NOT ENOUGH CME HOURS

It appears you don't have enough CME Hours to take this Post-Test. Feel free to buy additional CME hours or upgrade your current CME subscription plan

Subscribe

JOIN OBGFIRST AND GET CME/CE CREDITS

One of the benefits of an ObGFirst subscription is the ability to earn CME/CE credits from the ObG entries you read. Tap the button to learn more about ObGFirst

Learn More
Leaving ObG Website

You are now leaving the ObG website and on your way to PRIORITY at UCSF, an independent website. Therefore, we are not responsible for the content or availability of this site