Evidence-Based. Clearly Delivered.
Evidence-Based. Clearly Delivered.
The AMA’s Division of Economic and Health Policy Research reported that one-third of physicians will have been sued for medical malpractice. If you’re over 50 years old, then the rate jumps to almost 50% while for those under 40 only 8% have been sued. Female physicians are less likely than their male counterparts to have been sued. Not surprisingly, 63% of ObGyns have had to deal with a lawsuit, compared to psychiatrists who reported a 16% rate. While the plaintiff does not prevail in the vast majority, that is cold comfort for the emotional toll it takes on the provider and the attendant economic costs to the insurance and legal industries.
Medical liability tort reform including measures such as affidavits of merit to weed out frivolous claims, limits on noneconomic damages, and medical review panels have had some measure of success. There is research that ‘apology and disclosure programs’ may be successful, including in those cases where an adverse outcome could not have been prevented. There are some states that have laws governing apology for medical malpractice, where a physician apology cannot be used as an admission of fault in court. With these laws, an apology can mitigate the results of an unanticipated or poor medical outcome. All these measures must be balanced with both providers’ and patients’ constitutional rights to due process.
In addition, assumptions about provider practice in relation to fear of medical liability are not always based in fact. For example, the New England Journal of Medicine reported on outcomes in three states where legislation altered malpractice standards for emergency physicians. The hypothesis was that providers over-ordered studies because they were practicing ‘defensive medicine’. With new legislation in these states that raised the bar for plaintiffs, a patient now needed to demonstrate that the doctor had “actual, subjective awareness” of “the likelihood of serious injury” but nevertheless proceeded with “conscious indifference.” There was no change in physician practice as measured by imaging rates, average charges, or hospital admission rates.
1 in 3 physicians has been sued.
Malpractice suits and physician apologies in cancer care.
Efficacy of a physician’s words of empathy: an overview of state apology laws.
The Effect of Malpractice Reform on Emergency Department Care.
The contents of this Site, such as text, graphics, images, information obtained from The ObG Project’s licensors, and other material contained on the Site (“Content”) are for informational purposes only. The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional legal or medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of information you have read on the Site!
If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately. The ObG Project does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned on the Site. Reliance on any information provided by The ObG Project, The ObG Project employees, others appearing on the Site at the invitation of The ObG Project, or other visitors to the Site is solely at your own risk.
The Site may contain health- or medical-related materials that are sexually explicit. If you find these materials offensive, you may not want to use our Site.
Children’s Privacy
We are committed to protecting the privacy of children. You should be aware that this Site is not intended or designed to attract children under the age of 13. We do not collect personally identifiable information from any child we reasonably believe is under the age of 13.
Continue with ObGFirst™
Read the full article, unlock patient-friendly tools, and access subscriber resources across the site.
Get ObGFirst™ for only $9/mo
OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.
This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.
The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.
Jointly provided by
