In a secondary analysis of two major studies, researchers assessed outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor compared to expectant management with a cervical Bishop score of < 6.
1406 women had a Bishop score of <6 and after random allocation, 572 were induced while 600 were monitored expectantly. Analysis showed:
The data for this study (Bernardes, et al., BJOG, 2016) was obtained from two multi-centered, controlled randomized trials, HYPITAT and DIGITAT, which included women with gestational hypertension/mild preeclampsia and suspected intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) respectively. Both studies assessed women who were between 36 and 41 weeks, with a singleton fetus and cephalic presentation. While these original studies demonstrated that induction did not increase cesarean section rates, the question remains whether this was still true when the cervix was unripe.
Please sign up or log in to your ObGFirst to access this Premium Content
OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.
This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.
The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.
One of the benefits of an ObGFirst subscription is the ability to earn CME/CE credits from the ObG entries you read. Tap the button to learn more about ObGFirst
You are now leaving the ObG website and on your way to PRIORITY at UCSF, an independent website. Therefore, we are not responsible for the content or availability of this site