Local Estrogen Treatment Options for Vaginal Atrophy
CLINICAL ACTIONS:
A growing number of estrogen treatment options are available for postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Vulvovaginal atrophy is a common symptom of atrophic vaginitis (also referred to as the genitourinary syndrome of menopause or GSM) and can occur in both perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. If a patient reports vaginal dryness, consider the following
Establish a diagnosis of postmenopausal atrophy based on thorough history and physical exam
Confirm with an appropriate pelvic/ vaginal exam
Discuss use of estrogen, understanding that for some women based on medical history, systemic estrogen might not be an appropriate option
Even with a personal history of cancer, local estrogen may be an appropriate treatment (see ‘Key Points’ and ‘Related ObG Topics’ below) depending on the clinical scenario
Vaginal estrogens can be prescribed as
A cream inserted twice weekly using an applicator
A tablet inserted with an applicator
A soft gel pellet inserted twice weekly with no applicator (FDA approved May, 2018)
Ring made of silicone elastomere containing a drug core of estradiol hemihydrate (replaced every 3 months)
Local Estrogen Routes and Dosing for GSM
Estradiol-17β ring (releases 7.5 micrograms/d)
Replace every 3 months
Estradiol vaginal tablet (10 micrograms/d)
Place nightly for 2 weeks
Maintenance is one tablet 2 times/week
Note: this is the corrected dose in ACOG PB 141
Estradiol-17β cream (0.1 mg active ingredient/g)
2-4 g/d for 1 to 2 weeks
Gradually reduce to ½ initial dosage for 1 – 2 weeks
Maintenance is 1 g, 1 to 3 times/week
Conjugated estrogen cream (0.625 mg/g)
0.5–2 g/d for 21 days then off for 7 days
In practice during maintenance therapy, most women apply 1 – 3 times /week
Vaginal inserts (4-μg and 10-μg)
1 vaginal insert daily for 2 weeks
Maintenance is 1 insert twice weekly
SYNOPSIS:
Patients may experience vaginal atrophy as itching, dryness or pain during sexual activity. Vaginal estrogen has been shown to improve moderate to severe menopausal vaginal atrophy. Options for topical estrogen treatment are increasing. Women’s healthcare professionals need to confirm appropriate use of estrogen and help patients identify which treatment option will work best for their situation and lifestyle.
KEY POINTS:
During perimenopause and menopause, estrogen levels decline in vaginal tissues
Referred to as vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), this may result in discomfort or pain during intercourse or general dryness and discomfort
If patient complains of dyspareunia, and clinical examination is consistent with postmenopausal vaginal atrophy / atrophic vaginitis, local estrogen is the first line and most effective treatment
Estrogen treatment may not be appropriate or desired by all patients
Ascertain if estrogen is an appropriate option for the patient
Screen for a history of breast or uterine cancer
History of blood clots
Liver conditions
If patient is appropriate for treatment with local estrogen, offering the spectrum of choices can help a patient identify the product that will work best for them
While there is a theoretical concern regarding systemic estrogen absorption and risk for uterine cancer, based on evidence, professional organizations consider “the addition of progestin for endometrial protection is not needed” (ACOG)
Differentiating factors include
Creams
Can be used on the vulva as well as internally in the vagina
Tablets or caplets
Some can be used during the day
Some tablets may need to be used at night because of the way they dissolve
Applicators
May be an issue of patient preference and warrants discussion
Ring
Benefits include ease of use
For some women, there may be structural issues related to comfort and/or retention (e.g., short or narrow vagina / prolapse)
Make patients aware that there are non-estrogen options available for use by women who are not appropriate candidates for local estrogen including
Prasterone | Ospemifene
Laser Treatments have been advocated as a possible treatment, however VVA not a currently FDA-approved indication
More Follow-Up Data from the Estrogen vs Lubricant RCT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
RCTs have shown that vaginal estrogen creams and tablets, prasterone and ospemifene will provide relief from postmenopausal vaginal atrophy symptoms, but few studies have looked at sexual health and quality of life issues
Diem et al. (Menopause 2018) compared the efficacy of vaginal estradiol tablets and vaginal moisturizer to treat menopause-related quality of life and mood in women with vulvovaginal symptoms
METHODS:
Secondary data analysis of a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial (RCT)
Previous primary results on sexual function and decrease in severity of most bothersome symptoms were recently reported in JAMA Int Med (see summary below in ‘Related ObG Topics’)
Participants: Patients with moderate to severe symptoms of vulvovaginal itching, pain, dryness, irritation, or pain with penetration
Age 45 to 70 years, at least 2 years since last menses, report of at least 1 moderate to severe symptom at least weekly within the past 30 days or
Pain with penetration at least once monthly
Women were randomized to
10 µg estradiol tablet plus placebo gel
vaginal moisturizer plus placebo tablet
dual placebo
Tablets were daily for 2 weeks then twice weekly for remaining 10 weeks
Vaginal gel was used every 3 days for 12 weeks
The Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire was used to assess changes in quality of life
Evaluated specifically
Depressive symptoms as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire 8
Anxiety symptoms as measure by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
RESULTS:
Vaginal estradiol resulted in a greater improvement in total MENQOL scores, compared to dual placebo
Mean difference between arms -0.3 at 12 weeks; 95% CI, -0.5, 0.0; P = 0.01
A favorable group mean difference was observed for vaginal estradiol for MENQOL sexual function domain
-0.4 at 12 weeks; 95% CI -1.0, 0.1; P = 0.005
A favorable group mean difference for vaginal estrogen was not observed in any of the other domains
Treatment with vaginal moisturizer did not provide greater improvement compared to placebo in total MENQOL scores or any MENQOL domains
Mean difference 0.2 at 12 weeks; 95% CI -0.1, 0.4; P = 0.38
Neither treatment group showed improvement compared with placebo in the Patient Health Questionnaire 8 or Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire
CONCLUSION:
Treatment with low-dose vaginal estradiol modestly improved menopause-related quality of life and sexual function domain scores in postmenopausal women with moderate-severe vulvovaginal symptoms
Effect on MENQOL score was similar to low-dose oral 17-beta estradiol 0.5mg/day noted in a previous study
The previous paper that reported on this study did not find a significant difference in sexual function using Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) as the primary measuring tool
FSFI is much more detailed, while MENQOL asks three questions but focuses on whether a woman is bothered by a decrease in sexual deire, vaginal dryness during intercourse and avoiding intimacy
The authors conclude that “multiple approaches to measuring sexual QOL are needed”
Prasterone for Vulvovaginal Atrophy – What is it and How to Prescribe
CLINICAL ACTIONS:
Vulvovaginal atrophy is a common symptom of atrophic vaginitis (also referred to as the genitourinary syndrome of menopause or GSM) and can occur in both perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. If a patient reports vaginal dryness consider the following:
Confirm diagnosis of postmenopausal atrophy through vaginal exam
Discuss use of vaginal estrogen as an option
If patient is not an appropriate candidate for local estrogen or if patient would prefer not to use a direct estrogen product, prasterone may be an effective alternative
One vaginal insert (6.5 mg of prasterone) each evening at bedtime
SYNOPSIS:
Prasterone is an approved, steroid-based FDA treatment for postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Use is appropriate for women who complain of dyspareunia, or general discomfort due to dryness and thinning of the vaginal mucosa.
KEY POINTS:
During perimenopause and menopause, estrogen levels decline in vaginal tissues and is referred to as vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), which may result in discomfort or pain during intercourse
Local estrogen can be considered a first line treatment of VVA but may not be appropriate or desired by all patients
The FDA approved prasterone to treat women experiencing moderate to severe dyspareunia, a symptom of VVA, due to menopause
Prasterone is the first FDA approved product containing the synthetic active ingredient dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)
DHEA can convert to androgens and/or estrogens and, while the likelihood is low and the quantities minimal, a physician should disclose the following
Based on the fact that there is minimal data on safety in the setting of hormonally sensitive malignancy, the FDA warns against using prasterone if there is a history of or known or suspected breast cancer
Unexplained uterine bleeding is a contraindication to use
It is indicated for use only in postmenopausal women
Treating Postmenopausal Vaginal Atrophy When Estrogen is Not an Option
CLINICAL ACTIONS:
If a patient complains of dyspareunia, and clinical examination is consistent with postmenopausal vaginal atrophy / atrophic vaginitis, local estrogen is the first line of treatment, but there are alternatives that can be considered if the following two criteria are met:
Ascertain if the patient can, indeed, use estrogen and ensure that option was offered and an informed decision to decline was met
Screen for a history of breast or uterine cancer, history of blood clots or liver conditions
SYNOPSIS:
Some postmenopausal patients will not or cannot use local estrogen replacement therapy to treat vaginal atrophy/atrophic vaginitis. Common situations in which this is the case may include personal history of estrogen-sensitive breast cancer or endometrial cancer, although NAMS guidelines do recommend that low-dose local HT may be an option, in consultation with a patient’s oncologist in certain situations. Fortunately, a number of effective options are available for these women.
When a clinician cannot prescribe local estrogen, alternatives for postmenopausal vaginal atrophy include
Ospemifene – 60 mg daily
Should not be used concomitantly with estrogens
Should be used for 12 continuous weeks in order to gauge effectiveness
Ospemifene is a SERM
According to the FDA, there is insufficient data to use ospemifene in women with breast cancer
While there do not appear to be any cases of ospemifene causing endometrial cancer, a potential risk for this particular malignancy is mentioned in a boxed warning
Prasterone – One vaginal insert (6.5 mg) each evening at bedtime
FDA approved, steroid-based treatment for postmenopausal vaginal atrophy
Use is appropriate for women who complain of dyspareunia due to dryness and thinning of the vaginal mucosa
Based on the fact that there is minimal data on safety in the setting of hormonally sensitive malignancy, the FDA warns against using prasterone if there is a history of or known or suspected breast cancer
Lubricants
Have been found to be efficacious and may help alleviate symptoms
Laser Treatment – FDA Statement
The FDA has released a statement (August 2018) warning that “…safety and effectiveness of these devices hasn’t been evaluated or confirmed by the FDA for “vaginal rejuvenation.” In addition to the deceptive health claims being made with respect to these uses, the “vaginal rejuvenation” procedures have serious risks.”
NAMS has also responded and while welcoming the FDA’s mandate requiring companies to provide adequate data, the NAMS statement includes the following to assist with counseling
NAMS recommends that healthcare providers discuss the benefits and risks of all available treatment options for vaginal symptoms, including over-the-counter lubricants, vaginal moisturizers, and FDA-approved vaginal therapies such as vaginal estrogen and
intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone and oral therapies such as hormone therapy and ospemifene to determine the best treatment for women with GSM. When discussing vaginal energy-based therapies, informed discussion should include that these are FDA-approved devices for gynecology but have not received FDA approval for vaginal rejuvenation or procedures for GSM, sexual function, incontinence, or pelvic laxity and that even though short-term data are promising, more robust, sham-controlled, and longer-term data are needed.
KEY POINTS:
While alternative treatments will address vaginal dryness and atrophy, patients should be informed of the limitations of these treatments
Treatments that are effective for managing vaginal atrophy, may not help with other menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, night sweats or mood
OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.
Disclosure of Unlabeled Use
This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.
The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
Disclaimer
Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.
Jointly provided by
NOT ENOUGH CME HOURS
It appears you don't have enough CME Hours to take this Post-Test. Feel free to buy additional CME hours or upgrade your current CME subscription plan
You are now leaving the ObG website and on your way to PRIORITY at UCSF, an independent website. Therefore, we are not responsible for the content or availability of this site