BI-RADS: Standardizing Breast Imaging and Reporting
WHAT IS IT?
BI-RADS: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, was developed by the American College of Radiology (ACR) to standardize mammogram reporting, as well as breast ultrasound and MRI reporting.
The standard mammogram report includes the following
Indication and type of mammogram (screening/diagnostic)
Statement regarding breast density
Description of pertinent findings including size and location, oriented by quadrant and clock position
Summary of important findings and BI-RADS category
KEY POINTS:
BI-RADS Classification Standardizes Findings and Recommendations for Further Management
BI-RADS 0 : Incomplete
Recall for additional imaging/comparison with prior examinations, or both
BI-RADS 1: Negative (Essentially 0% chance of malignancy)
Routine screening
BI-RADS 2: Benign (Essentially 0% likelihood of malignancy)
Routine screening
BI-RADS 3: Probably benign (> 0% but ≤ 2% likelihood of malignancy)
6 month follow-up or continued surveillance
BI-RADS 4: Suspicious (> 2% but < 95% likelihood of malignancy)
4A: Low suspicion for malignancy (> 2% to ≤ 10% likelihood)
4B: Moderate suspicion for malignancy (> 10% to ≤ 50% likelihood)
4C: High suspicion for malignancy (> 50% to < 95% likelihood)
Tissue diagnosis needed for all BI-RADS 4 categories
BI-RADS 5: Highly suggestive of malignancy (95% likelihood of malignancy)
Tissue diagnosis needed
BI-RADS 6: Known, biopsy proven malignancy
Surgical excision when appropriate
Density Categories
Category a: Breasts are almost entirely fatty
Prevalence: 10% of the population
Mammography considered highly sensitive in this setting (88%)
Category b: There are scattered areas of fibroglandular density
Prevalence: 43% of the population
Still sensitive but decreased from category a (82%)
Category c: Breasts are heterogeneously dense
Prevalence: 39%
Small masses may be obscured
Sensitivity drops to 69%
Note: Breast cancer risk is 1.2 relative risk compared to average breast density
Category d: Breasts are extremely dense
Breasts are extremely dense
Significantly lowers sensitivity of mammography (62%)
Note: Breast cancer risk is 2.1 relative risk compared to average breast density
Atypical Hyperplasia of the Breast: Follow up and Management
CLINICAL ACTIONS:
Atypical hyperplasia of the breast is a benign but high-risk condition that can be either ductal (ADH) or lobular (ALH); these occur with equal frequency and together are found in about 10% of breast biopsies. Either entity confers a long-term risk of breast cancer that approaches 30% at 25 years of follow-up.
Surgically excise atypical hyperplasia when found on a core-needle biopsy
Necessary to avoid missing invasive cancer due to sampling error
Upgrading can be ≥15 to 30%
Exception: Clinical and radiologic follow-up appropriate when atypical hyperplasia is an incidental finding at the site of a targeted biopsy
Current breast cancer risk assessment models perform poorly among women with atypical hyperplasia
Atypical hyperplasia associated with a relative risk of 4 for future breast cancer
Current NCCN screening recommendations include annual mammography, breast awareness, and clinical encounter every 6 to 12 months, and in addition
Consider tomosynthesis
Consider annual MRI to begin at diagnosis
Based on emerging evidence, ACOG also recommends consideration of yearly breast MRI for atypical hyperplasia
Encourage pharmacologic risk reduction with either a selective estrogen-receptor modulator (SERM) or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for prevention of breast cancer
Counsel about healthy lifestyle including ideal body weight and alcohol reduction
Atypical hyperplasia is generally not an indication for surgical risk-reduction / mastectomy
SYNOPSIS:
Atypical hyperplasia of the breast reflects proliferation of dysplastic epithelial cell populations. It is felt to be a transitional zone between benign and malignant breast disease, containing some but not all features of a cancer. Although statistically the long term risk of breast cancer equals or exceeds that conferred by family history and other risk factors, current guidelines in screening do not reflect this. Similarly, pharmacologic risk reduction strategies have been adopted by <1% of women who could potentially benefit from them.
KEY POINTS:
Atypical lobular hyperplasia is histologically similar to lobular carcinoma in situ, but less extensive
Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ share histologic features
Both types of hyperplasia share molecular characteristics and gene expression, indicating possibly a continuum of abnormalities.
While multiple disciplines are required to diagnose and manage both benign breast disorders and breast cancer, the most important interaction with a patient remains the initial office visit
Obtain careful history of all breast related symptoms including duration, changes in symptoms over time, presence and color of nipple discharge
Identify risk factors for breast cancer, including
Advanced age (over 65)
Positive family history
Age >30 at first birth
Nulliparity
Never breastfed
Menopausal hormone therapy
Alcohol use (not clear what the threshold is)
Visually inspect and manually palpate the breasts, axillae and supraclavicular nodal regions
Clinical documentation of any mass should include size, consistency, distance from areola and clock position in the breast
Diagnostic imaging includes ultrasonography, mammogram or digital tomosynthesis
Manage breast lesion based on age, clinical suspicion, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and other imaging findings
Ultrasound can differentiate solid from cystic lesions
Histology can be obtained from fine needle aspiration (FNA), core needle biopsy or excisional biopsy, procedures that are usually performed by radiologists or surgeons
Women ≥30 years and older with palpable mass
Mammogram followed by ultrasound, if necessary
Women under 30 years with a palpable mass: Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality
If ultrasound imaging is suspicious for cancer, follow up with tissue biopsy
If ultrasound does not suggest malignancy but clinical suspicion remains, perform a diagnostic mammogram
If ultrasound imaging suggests a benign cyst or a benign appearing solid mass options are to follow-up with physical exam +/- ultrasound/diagnostic mammogram every 6-12 months for 1-2 years to assess stability
Women presenting due to a mass that cannot be palpated by patient or clinician should not be dismissed and must be followed up with imaging
SYNOPSIS:
Benign breast lesions can be categorized as nonproliferative (breast cysts), proliferative without atypia (fibroadenoma, intraductal papilloma, fibrocystic change) which may carry a small risk (1.5 to 2 times above general population) for breast cancer and atypical hyperplasia (ductal or lobular). The latter category carries a substantially increased risk of subsequent invasive cancer in either breast (see ‘Related ObG Topics’, below). Nipple discharge is common, and usually benign. Unilateral, uniductal and spontaneous discharge carries a higher risk of malignancy and should be further evaluated with ultrasound.
KEY POINTS:
Women ≥30 years with palpable breast masses shown to be solid on imaging should be biopsied if BI-RADS 4-5, or if BI-RADS 1-3 with high clinical suspicion
Observation an option if BI-RADS 1-3 and low clinical suspicion (see ‘Related ObG Topics’ below)
Women with simple cysts can undergo routine follow-up
Consideration for biopsy should be given to complicated cysts with BI-RADS 1-3
Complex cysts with BI-RADS 4-5 on imaging require biopsy
When common skin problems are identified in the breast such as psoriasis, eczema, contact dermatitis, Candida infections, standard treatment should be used
Skin edema, warmth and erythema as well as ulceration, nipple retraction/crusting/scaling should raise concerns for malignancy and require tissue diagnosis
OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.
Disclosure of Unlabeled Use
This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.
The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
Disclaimer
Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.
Jointly provided by
NOT ENOUGH CME HOURS
It appears you don't have enough CME Hours to take this Post-Test. Feel free to buy additional CME hours or upgrade your current CME subscription plan
You are now leaving the ObG website and on your way to PRIORITY at UCSF, an independent website. Therefore, we are not responsible for the content or availability of this site