• About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    • ObGFirst
  • COVID-19
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • GrandRounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • Now@ObG
  • Media
About Us Contact Us Login ObGFirst
  • COVID-19
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • GrandRounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • Now@ObG
  • Media
Grand Rounds

Cesarean and Morbid Obesity: Pfannenstiel or Vertical Skin Incision?

image_pdfFavoriteLoadingFavorite

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

  • Martin et al. (Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2021) assessed whether Pfannenstiel or vertical skin incision for cesarean resulted in fewer wound complications in women with morbid obesity

METHODS:

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • Participants
    • BMI ≥40
    • Cesarean delivery between 2012 and 2019
  • Exposures
    • Unexposed: Pfannenstiel skin incision
    • Exposed: Vertical skin incision
  • Study design
    • To account for imbalances in demographics between exposure groups, vertical and Pfannenstiel skin incision patients were matched 1:4 for age, BMI, smoking status, and diabetes
    • Comparisons of demographics and outcomes were made by χ2 and t test
    • Subgroup analysis was performed according to location of vertical skin incision in relation to the umbilicus
  • Primary outcome
    • Composite wound morbidity (until 42 days postpartum) including wound separation, infection, and dehiscence
  • Secondary outcomes
    • Individual composite components
    • Maternal and neonatal outcomes

RESULTS:

  • Pfannenstiel incision: 489 patients | Vertical incision: 123 patients
  • Overall frequency of wound morbidity: 13.2%
  • There was no difference in the primary outcome when comparing Pfannenstiel with vertical skin incision
    • Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.5 (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.8)
  • Patients with a vertical skin incision were more likely to undergo
    • Vertical hysterotomy: aOR 138.7 (95% CI, 46.9 to 410)
    • Transfusion: aOR 5.4 (95% CI, 1.8 to 16.5)

Subgroup Analysis: Vertical incisions classified as Supraumbilical and Infraumbilical

  • Infraumbilical vertical skin incision vs Pfannenstiel was associated with
    • Increased wound morbidity: OR 2.46 (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.5)
    • Increased wound infection: OR 2.5 (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.6)
  • Supraumbilical vertical skin incision vs Pfannenstiel was associated with
    • Increased risk of wound separation: OR 8.9 (95% CI,1.2 to 64.7)
    • Increased NICU admission: OR 2.6 (95% CI,1.2 to 6)
  • Compared to Pfannenstiel, both types of vertical skin incision were associated with increased odds of vertical hysterotomy and transfusion

CONCLUSION:

  • The frequency of post-cesarean wound morbidity in women with morbid obesity was similar if the incision performed was a Pfannenstiel or a vertical skin incision
    • However, vertical skin incisions were associated with increased odds of hysterotomy and transfusion need
    • Compared to Pfannenstiel, infraumbilical vertical skin incision was associated with increased wound morbidity
  • Limitations include the limited number of vertical incisions which may have limited the power of the study to find a difference between vertical and Pfannenstiel incisions
  • The authors state

…potential benefit gained from fewer wound complications after supraumbilical vertical skin incision may come at the expense of increased odds of vertical hysterotomy and the implications on future childbearing should be considered 

Learn More – Primary Sources:

Association of Skin Incision Type With Postoperative Cesarean Delivery Complications in Morbidly Obese Patients

Want to stay on top of key guidelines and research papers?

ObGFirst® – Try It Free! »

image_pdfFavoriteLoadingFavorite
< Previous
All Grand Rounds Posts
Next >

Related ObG Topics:

RCT Results: Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Prevent SSIs in Obese Women Following Cesarean
Increasing BMI and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: What Are the Risks?
What is the Best Practices Prevention Bundle for Post Cesarean Infection?
RCT Results: Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Dressing Among Women with Obesity Undergoing Cesarean

Sections

  • COVID-19
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • Grand Rounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • Now@ObG
  • Media

Are you an
ObG Insider?

Get specially curated clinical summaries delivered to your inbox every week for free

  • Site Map/
  • © ObG Project/
  • Terms and Conditions/
  • Privacy/
  • Contact Us/
© ObG Project
SSL Certificate


  • Already an ObGFirst Member?
    Welcome back

    Log In

    Want to sign up?
    Get guideline notifications
    CME Included

    Sign Up

Get Guideline Alerts Direct to Your Phone
Try ObGFirst Free!

Sign In

Lost your password?

Sign Up for ObGFirst and Stay Ahead

  • - Professional guideline notifications
  • - Daily summary of a clinically relevant
    research paper
  • - Includes 1 hour of CME every month

ObGFirst Free Trial

Already a Member of ObGFirst®?

Please log in to ObGFirst to access the 2T US Atlas

Password Trouble?

Not an ObGFirst® Member Yet?

  • - Access 2T US Atlas
  • - Guideline notifications
  • - Daily research paper summaries
  • - And lots more!
ObGFirst Free Trial

Media - Internet

Computer System Requirements

OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.

Disclosure of Unlabeled Use

This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.

The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.

Disclaimer

Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.

Jointly provided by

NOT ENOUGH CME HOURS

It appears you don't have enough CME Hours to take this Post-Test. Feel free to buy additional CME hours or upgrade your current CME subscription plan

Subscribe

JOIN OBGFIRST AND GET CME/CE CREDITS

One of the benefits of an ObGFirst subscription is the ability to earn CME/CE credits from the ObG entries you read. Tap the button to learn more about ObGFirst

Learn More
Leaving ObG Website

You are now leaving the ObG website and on your way to PRIORITY at UCSF, an independent website. Therefore, we are not responsible for the content or availability of this site