• About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    • ObGFirst
  • COVID-19
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • GrandRounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • Now@ObG
  • Media
About Us Contact Us Login ObGFirst
  • COVID-19
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • GrandRounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • Now@ObG
  • Media
Grand Rounds

Is Joint Commission Accreditation Associated with Better Patient Outcomes?

image_pdfFavoriteLoadingFavorite

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 

  • Lam et al. (BMJ, 2018) assessed whether patients admitted to accredited hospitals (Joint Commission) had superior outcomes when compared to independent accrediting organizations  

METHODS: 

  • Observational study  
    • Hospitals in the United States 
    • Patients ≥65 years of age  
  • Hospitals were either 
    • Accredited by the Joint Commission 
    • Reviewed by state survey or accredited by an alternative organization  
  • Main outcomes  
    • Death at 30 days from the admission date (risk adjusted) 
    • Readmission rates at 30 days  
    • Based on 15 common medical causes of hospital admissions and six common costly surgical procedures 
  • Healthcare Provider and Systems (HCAHPS) patient experience scores also assessed  
  • P value set at 0.0125 as threshold for significance

RESULTS: 

  • 4,242,648 patients 
    • 3337 accredited hospitals | 1063 state-reviewed hospitals 
  • Compared to patients at state-based reviewed hospitals, patients admitted to accredited hospitals had 
    • Lower 30 day mortality rates than those at hospitals that were reviewed by a state survey agency (did not meet the prespecified P level)  
      • 10.2% vs 10.6%, difference 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1% to 0.8%), P=0.03) 
    • Identical rates of mortality for the six surgical conditions 
      • 2.4% vs 2.4%, difference 0.0% (95% CI, −0.3% to 0.3%; P=0.99) 
    • Lower readmission rates for 15 medical conditionals  
      • 22.4% vs 23.2%, difference 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4% to 1.3%), P<0.001)  
    • No difference was seen for surgical conditions 
      • 15.9% vs 15.6%, difference 0.3% (95% CI, −1.2% to 1.6%; P=0.75) 
  • There were no statistically significant differences in 30 day mortality or readmission rates (for both the medical or surgical conditions) between hospitals accredited by The Joint Commission and those accredited by other independent organizations 
  • Patient experience scores were modestly better at state survey hospitals than at accredited hospitals 
    • Summary star rating 3.4 vs 3.2, difference 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.3; P<0.001)

CONCLUSION: 

  • US hospital accreditation done by independent organizations rather than Joint Commission is not associated with lower mortality
  • The authors conclude 

In the present study, we found that hospitals accredited by private organizations did not have better patient outcomes than hospitals reviewed by a state survey agency. Furthermore, we found that accreditation by The Joint Commission, which is the most common form of hospital accreditation, was not associated with better patient outcomes than other lesser known, independent accrediting agencies.

Learn More – Primary Sources: 

Association between patient outcomes and accreditation in US hospitals: observational study

image_pdfFavoriteLoadingFavorite

< Previous
All Grand Rounds Posts
Next >

Related ObG Topics:

Is There a Relationship Between Patient Satisfaction and Health Care Utilization, Expenditures, and Mortality?
Where Does all the Money Go? Estimated Administrative Costs Related to Physician Billing Activities
How Many Clicks Does It Take to Order a Tylenol Pill?

Sections

  • COVID-19
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • Grand Rounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • Now@ObG
  • Media

Are you an
ObG Insider?

Get specially curated clinical summaries delivered to your inbox every week for free

  • Site Map/
  • © ObG Project/
  • Terms and Conditions/
  • Privacy/
  • Contact Us/
© ObG Project
SSL Certificate


  • Already an ObGFirst Member?
    Welcome back

    Log In

    Want to sign up?
    Get guideline notifications
    CME Included

    Sign Up

Get Guideline Alerts Direct to Your Phone
Try ObGFirst Free!

Sign In

Lost your password?

Sign Up for ObGFirst and Stay Ahead

  • - Professional guideline notifications
  • - Daily summary of a clinically relevant
    research paper
  • - Includes 1 hour of CME every month

ObGFirst Free Trial

Already a Member of ObGFirst®?

Please log in to ObGFirst to access the 2T US Atlas

Password Trouble?

Not an ObGFirst® Member Yet?

  • - Access 2T US Atlas
  • - Guideline notifications
  • - Daily research paper summaries
  • - And lots more!
ObGFirst Free Trial

Media - Internet

Computer System Requirements

OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.

Disclosure of Unlabeled Use

This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.

The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.

Disclaimer

Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.

Jointly provided by

NOT ENOUGH CME HOURS

It appears you don't have enough CME Hours to take this Post-Test. Feel free to buy additional CME hours or upgrade your current CME subscription plan

Subscribe

JOIN OBGFIRST AND GET CME/CE CREDITS

One of the benefits of an ObGFirst subscription is the ability to earn CME/CE credits from the ObG entries you read. Tap the button to learn more about ObGFirst

Learn More
Leaving ObG Website

You are now leaving the ObG website and on your way to PRIORITY at UCSF, an independent website. Therefore, we are not responsible for the content or availability of this site