Evidence-Based. Clearly Delivered.
Evidence-Based. Clearly Delivered.
In a 2007 case in South Carolina, plaintiff parents had sued Quest Diagnostics and Athena Diagnostics for wrongful death, alleging a misclassification of an SCN1A mutation in their son as a variant of unknown significance (VUS). Several months after that report, the child had a fatal seizure and died.
South Carolina code defines healthcare providers as “physicians and surgeons; directors, officers, and trustees of hospitals; nurses; oral surgeons; dentists; pharmacists; chiropractors; optometrists; podiatrists; hospitals; nursing homes; or any similar category of licensed health care providers.” The question facing the court was whether the lab is acting as a healthcare provider “when, at the request of a patient’s treating physician, the laboratory performs genetic testing to detect an existing disease or disorder”.
The court answered ‘yes’, meaning that the genetic testing laboratory is functioning as “a licensed healthcare provider” when performing diagnostic testing at the request of a treating physician for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment, which is a core function of hospitals in diagnosing and treating patients. Another section of the South Carolina code states that “an institution providing health care services…for the diagnosis, prevention, treatment, cure, or relief of a health condition, illness, injury, or disease…including, but not limited to, hospitals and . . . diagnostic, laboratory, and imaging centers.” One judge dissented and wrote that the laboratory’s services were too limited and specialized to make it a healthcare provider.
In this case, the report was written in 2007. The plaintiff alleges she did not learn about the 2007 report until 2014 and that is when the timeline begins. If this is a case of negligence, then there is a concept of ‘discovery’, and the clock can start ticking from the time one recognizes an error. On the other hand, Quest asserts that if they are being considered a health care provider, then the timeline must begin in 2007 when the report was issued to the child’s medical geneticist.
The timeline ruling is critical for the plaintiff because the time to file a medical malpractice lawsuit against a licensed healthcare provider in South Carolina is within three years, with the right to sue lost entirely after six years.
This case is being watched closely because the inclusion of laboratories within the broader definition of healthcare providers could have implications in terms of responsibilities and potential liability. There was an important footnote by the judges – one can still sue a healthcare provider for negligence (which includes the ‘discovery’ principle) so this case may not yet be over.
The contents of this Site, such as text, graphics, images, information obtained from The ObG Project’s licensors, and other material contained on the Site (“Content”) are for informational purposes only. The Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional legal or medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of information you have read on the Site!
If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately. The ObG Project does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned on the Site. Reliance on any information provided by The ObG Project, The ObG Project employees, others appearing on the Site at the invitation of The ObG Project, or other visitors to the Site is solely at your own risk.
The Site may contain health- or medical-related materials that are sexually explicit. If you find these materials offensive, you may not want to use our Site.
Children’s Privacy
We are committed to protecting the privacy of children. You should be aware that this Site is not intended or designed to attract children under the age of 13. We do not collect personally identifiable information from any child we reasonably believe is under the age of 13.
Continue with ObGFirst™
Read the full article, unlock patient-friendly tools, and access subscriber resources across the site.
Get ObGFirst™ for only $9/mo
OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.
This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.
The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.
Jointly provided by
