Grand Rounds
CMECNE

Results of the SALVO Trial: Cell Salvage During Cesarean Section

FavoriteLoading

Learning Objectives and CME/Disclosure Information

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

  • Cell salvage collects, processes, and returns the woman’s own blood lost during surgery
  • Cell salvage during non-obstetric surgery can prevent blood transfusion
  • Limited data is available for the benefit of this technique during cesarean section
  • There is a concern for amniotic fluid embolism and red cell isoimmunization with cell salvage
  • Khan et al. (PLoS Med., 2017) sought to confirm if cell salvage can reduce the need for transfusion

METHODS:

  • Pragmatic randomized controlled trial
  • SALVO trial (cell SALVage in Obstetrics), including 26 UK obstetric units
  • Women undergoing cesarean section at risk of hemorrhage were randomized to either
    • Cell salvage
    • Current standard of care without salvage use
  • Multivariable models was used for an intention-to-treat analysis
  • Primary outcome
    • Rates of donor blood transfusion
  • Secondary outcome
    • Fetomaternal hemorrhage ≥2 ml in RhD-negative women with RhD-positive babies

RESULTS:

  • 3,028 women were randomized, with 2,990 women included in the analysis
    • 1498 in intervention group / 1492 in control group
  • Intervention group
    • Cell salvage deployed in 95.6%
    • 50.8% had salvaged blood returned (mean volume of returned blood was 259.9 ml)
    • 3.9% of the control group had cell salvage
  • Blood transfusion rate
    • 3.5% in the control group
    • 2.5% in the intervention group
    • Adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.01, p = 0.056)
    • Adjusted risk difference -1.03 (95% CI, -2.13 to 0.06)
  • Planned subgroup analysis: Comparing transfusion rates in emergency vs elective cesarean
    • Emergency cesarean: Transfusion rate was 4.6% in controls vs 3.0% in the intervention group among emergency cesareans (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.99)
    • Elective cesarean: Transfusion rate was 2.2% in controls vs 1.8% (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.83)
  • Fetomaternal hemorrhage
    • 25.6% in the intervention group vs 10.5% in the control group
      • Adjusted OR 5.63 (95% CI, 1.43 to 22.14; p = 0.013)
  • There were no cases of amniotic fluid embolism

CONCLUSION:

  • The use of cell salvage did not significantly reduce use of donor blood transfusion in all women undergoing cesarean section
    • Emergency cesarean sections have higher blood loss and transfusion is usually the mainstay of treatment to treat hemorrhage
    • The potential for benefit in this group merits confirmation through additional research
  • Cell salvage was associated with increased maternal exposure to fetal blood among RhD-negative mothers
    • Authors expressed caution in interpreting these results as there were large rates of missing data
    • Additional doses of anti-D following birth of an RhD-positive baby to an RhD-negative mother after cell salvage may be required

Learn More – Primary Sources:

Cell salvage and donor blood transfusion during cesarean section: A pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (SALVO). 

Take a post-test and get CME credits

FavoriteLoading

Are you an
ObG Insider?

Get specially curated clinical summaries delivered to your inbox every week for free

Sign Up for ObGFirst and Stay Ahead

  • - Professional guideline notifications
  • - Daily summary of a clinically relevant
    research paper
  • - Includes 1 hour of CME every month

Not an ObGFirst® Member Yet?

  • - Access 2T US Atlas
  • - Guideline notifications
  • - Daily research paper summaries
  • - And lots more!