• About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Login
    • ObGFirst
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • GrandRounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • COVID-19
About Us Contact Us Login ObGFirst
  • Alerts
  • OB
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • GrandRounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • COVID-19
Grand Rounds

Does the Timing of a Loss of One Twin Affect the Risk for Preterm Birth?

image_pdfFavoriteLoadingFavorite

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

  • Single intrauterine death (sIUD) of one twin is associated with co-twin demise and preterm birth (PTB)
  • Previous research suggested the rate of PTB was 68% in monochorionic (MC) twin and 54% in dichorionic (DC) twin pregnancies
    • Limitations include small number of cases | lack of stratification according by GA at sIUD | heterogeneity in perinatal
  • D’Antonio et al. (Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017) sought to determine whether gestational age at sIUD is associated with PTB

METHODS:

  • Retrospective cohort study
  • Participants
    • Women with twin pregnancies in 9 hospitals participating in Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK), over a 10-year period from 2000
    • Women entered into routine care by 11 weeks
  • Exclusions
    • Cases with double fetal loss or sIUD occurring at or after 34 weeks were excluded from analysis
    • Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), termination of pregnancy and fetal or chromosomal abnormality, pregnancies of unknown chorionicity, MC monoamniotic and high-order multiple gestations were also excluded
  • Ultrasound data were matched to hospital delivery records and to a mandatory national register for stillbirth and neonatal loss
  • Fetal loss: Defined as spontaneous death occurring after 14 weeks of gestation
  • The relative risk (RR) of PTB was assessed
    • At < 34, < 32, and < 28 weeks of gestation in twin pregnancies complicated by sIUD
    • Compared to pregnancies without fetal loss
    • The risk of PTB at < 34 weeks was stratified according to the gestational age at diagnosis of sIUD
    • Chorionicity subgroup analysis also performed
  • Risk of PTB at < 34 weeks of gestation after sIUD was explored according to the gestational age at death using 3 time periods
    • 14–19 weeks | 20–25 weeks | 26–32 weeks
  • Primary outcome
    • Determine the risk of PTB, stratified according to gestational age at diagnosis of sIUD

RESULTS:

  • Following exclusion for miscarriage, TTTS and sIUD >34 weeks, 3013 twin pregnancies were included
    • 2,469 DC and 544 MC
  • Incidence of IUD was higher in MC twins (3.9%) compared with DC twin pregnancies (1.9%)
    • Odds ratio (OR) of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.2–3.4; P < 0.006).
  • Median gestational age at birth was lower in pregnancies complicated by sIUD (32 weeks) compared with those that were not (36.7 weeks) (P < 0.001)
  • The trend persisted when stratifying by chorionicity (P < 0.0001 for both MC and DC pregnancies)
  • Compared to twin pregnancies without fetal loss, the risk of PTB was higher in pregnancies with sIUD
    • < 34 weeks: Relative risk (RR) 4.3 (95% CI, 3.5–5.2)
    • < 32 weeks: RR 6.1 (95% CI, 4.6–8.1)
    • < 28 weeks: RR 12.4 (95% CI, 6.9–22.2)
  • Increased PTB risk was also observed when stratifying for MC and DC twin gestations
  • MC pregnancies affected by sIUD, compared to DC pregnancies affected by sIUD, were not at significantly increased risk of PTB before either 34, 32 or 28 weeks of gestation
  • The risk of PTB at < 34 weeks of gestation was higher when the sIUD occurred at a later gestational age (chi-square test for trend, P < 0.001)
    • This trend remained consistent when stratifying based on chorionicity

CONCLUSION:

  • Twin pregnancies complicated by sUID have a significantly higher risk of PTB at <34, <32 and <28 weeks gestation
  • This risk is not modified by chorionicity
  • The risk of preterm was higher when the sIUD occurred in the second half of pregnancy
  • The authors recommend larger multicenter studies to determine the actual risk of spontaneous PTB

Learn More – Primary Sources:

Influence of chorionicity and gestational age at single fetal loss on risk of preterm birth in twin pregnancy: analysis of STORK multiple pregnancy cohort

image_pdfFavoriteLoadingFavorite

< Previous
All Grand Rounds Posts
Next >

Related ObG Topics:

What is the Actual Relative Risk of Preeclampsia in Twins Compared to Singletons?
Do Twin-Specific Nomograms Really Make a Difference?
Preventing Preterm Birth in Twins – What works?
Planned C-Section or Vaginal Delivery in Twins?

Sections

  • Alerts
  • OB
  • GYN
    • GYN
    • Sexual Health
  • 2T US Atlas
  • The Genome
  • Primary Care
  • Your Practice
  • Grand Rounds
  • My Bookshelf
  • COVID-19

Are you an
ObG Insider?

Get specially curated clinical summaries delivered to your inbox every week for free

  • Site Map/
  • © ObG Project/
  • Terms and Conditions/
  • Privacy/
  • Contact Us/
© ObG Project
SSL Certificate


  • Already an ObGFirst Member?
    Welcome back

    Log In

    Want to sign up?
    Get guideline notifications
    CME Included

    Sign Up

Sign In

Lost your password?

Sign Up for ObGFirst and Stay Ahead

  • - Professional guideline notifications
  • - Daily summary of a clinically relevant
    research paper
  • - Includes 1 hour of CME every month

ObGFirst Free Trial

Already a Member of ObGFirst®?

Please log in to ObGFirst to access the 2T US Atlas

Password Trouble?

Not an ObGFirst® Member Yet?

  • - Access 2T US Atlas
  • - Guideline notifications
  • - Daily research paper summaries
  • - And lots more!
ObGFirst Free Trial

Media - Internet

Computer System Requirements

OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.

Disclosure of Unlabeled Use

This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.

The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.

Disclaimer

Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.

Jointly provided by

NOT ENOUGH CME HOURS

It appears you don't have enough CME Hours to take this Post-Test. Feel free to buy additional CME hours or upgrade your current CME subscription plan

Subscribe

JOIN OBGFIRST AND GET CME/CE CREDITS

One of the benefits of an ObGFirst subscription is the ability to earn CME/CE credits from the ObG entries you read. Tap the button to learn more about ObGFirst

Learn More
Leaving ObG Website

You are now leaving the ObG website and on your way to PRIORITY at UCSF, an independent website. Therefore, we are not responsible for the content or availability of this site