Grand Rounds
CMECNE

Can Maternal Pulse Pressure be Used to Determine the Need for Fluid Bolus Prior to Epidural?

FavoriteLoading

Learning Objectives and CME/Disclosure Information

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 

  • Epidural anesthesia can be associated with maternal hypotension and consequent changes in fetal status 
    • Fetal heart rate (FHR) can be abnormal in 14-30% of cases following an epidural  
  • No set guidelines exist as to necessity of a fluid bolus 
  • Literature exists that low maternal pulse pressure, indicating hypovolemia, may be a helpful guide in determining requirement for fluid bolus  
  • Lappen et al. (Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017) sought to determine whether increasing the IV fluid bolus volume at the time of epidural placement in women with narrow pulse pressure would reduce adverse fetal cardiac events   

METHODS: 

  • Randomized controlled trial (RCT) 
  • Inclusion Criteria 
    • Normotensive 
    • Presented for either spontaneous or induction of labor 
    • Narrow pulse pressure (systolic BP–diastolic BP) <45 mm Hg on admission 
    • Nonanomalous fetus 
  • Eligibility for randomization at epidural request if within 6 hours of admission and FHR category 1
  • Patients were randomized into 2 arms, both receiving lactated Ringer’s over 30 minutes initiated with patient epidural request and with preparation for or initiation of epidural placement by the anesthesiology team  
    • 500-mL (institutional standard) with programmed infusion pump (rate 999 mL/h) 
    • 1,500-mL intravenous fluid bolus using a pressure bag over 30 minutes  
  • A reference group with admission pulse pressure ≥50 mm Hg or greater was also evaluated 
  • Primary outcome  
    • Category 2 or 3 FHR within 60 minutes after epidural test dose 
  • Secondary outcomes 
    • Maternal hypotension  
    • Composite resuscitative interventions to correct FHR and maternal hypotension 

RESULTS: 

  • 139 women received 500-mL and 137 women received 1,500-mL fluid bolus 
  • 138 women were evaluated in the reference group 
  • Demographic, obstetric, and labor characteristics were generally similar between groups 
    • 1,500-mL arm had higher rate of admission for induction  
  • Comparing the 1,500-mL group to the 500-mL group, there were  
    • Fewer FHR abnormalities (38.0% vs 51.8%) with relative risk (RR) of 0.73, 95% CI 0.56–0.96; P=.02 
    • Fewer episodes of maternal systolic hypotension (10.2% vs 34.5%) with RR of 0.30, 95% CI 0.17–0.51; P<.001 
    • Fewer composite interventions (18.3% vs 44.2%) with RR of 0.42, 95% CI 0.28–0.62; P<.001 
  • FHR abnormalities remained significantly less frequent in the reference group than among women with a narrow pulse pressure on admission for delivery 

CONCLUSION: 

  • An 1,500-mL intravenous fluid bolus in women with a narrow pulse pressure decreases FHR abnormalities, frequency of postepidural hypotension, and need for interventions to reverse maternal hypotension and abnormal FHR patterns  
  • Admission maternal pulse pressure can be used as a surrogate for central volume status and may identify women who would benefit from a larger IV bolus prior to epidural  

Learn More – Primary Sources:  

Maternal Pulse Pressure and the Risk of Postepidural Complications: A Randomized Controlled Trial 

Take a post-test and get CME credits

Now You Can Get ObG Clinical Research Summaries Direct to Your Phone, with ObGFirst

ObGFirst® – Try It Free! »

FavoriteLoading

Related ObG Topics:

Does Epidural Anesthesia Impact the Second Stage of Labor?
Results of the BUMPES Trial: Sitting Up or Lying Down to Promote Vaginal Delivery with an Epidural in the 2nd Stage of Labor?
What is the Optimal Blood Pressure Target When Treating Hypertension?

Sign Up for ObGFirst and Stay Ahead

  • - Professional guideline notifications
  • - Daily summary of a clinically relevant
    research paper
  • - Includes 1 hour of CME every month

Not an ObGFirst® Member Yet?

  • - Access 2T US Atlas
  • - Guideline notifications
  • - Daily research paper summaries
  • - And lots more!