This study by Xin-Hang et al. (Scientific Reports, 2017) sought to explore the effectiveness of using cervical pessaries to prevent preterm birth and perinatal morbidity and mortality in asymptomatic women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix (length ≤25 mm).
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
A total of 1,412 women were analyzed. Cervical pessary placement was not shown to reduce the risk of spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks’ gestation (RR 0.71; 95%CI, 0.21–2.43, P = 0.59). Cervical pessary placement was not associated with any maternal or neonatal adverse effects. The authors concluded that although analysis of these trials did not indicate that cervical pessaries decrease the risk of spontaneous preterm birth, large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings due to study limitations. Such limitations include the potential bias due to inability to blind researchers and providers. Furthermore, only 3 studies could be included and therefore the sample size does not allow for proper analysis of cofounding variable (for example BMI and varying cervical lengths). Finally, the use of progestogens in combination with pessaries remains to be determined.
Cervical Pessary for Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Meta-Analysis
Please log in to ObGFirst to access the 2T US Atlas
OBG Project CME requires a modern web browser (Internet Explorer 10+, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge). Certain educational activities may require additional software to view multimedia, presentation, or printable versions of their content. These activities will be marked as such and will provide links to the required software. That software may be: Adobe Flash, Apple QuickTime, Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft PowerPoint, Windows Media Player, or Real Networks Real One Player.
This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the FDA. The planners of this activity do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.
The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the planners. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.
Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information
presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patient’s conditions and possible contraindications and/or dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.
Jointly provided by
